![]() |
Armstrong Magnetics, Inc. | (800) 965-4968 | sales@armsmag.com | Shopping Cart ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Posted on May 25, 2017
When choosing a magnet material to be incorporated into your specific application, their
properties need to be identified and compared to correctly evaluate their functional workability
and economic feasibility. Design engineers should consider the magnetic requirement, physical
requirement, working temperature range, product cost and manufacturing lead time. There is a list
of commercially available permanent magnet materials to choose from:
neodymium magnets, samarium cobalt,
alnico, ceramic and flexible. Let take a quick look at their difference.
Table: Key properties comparisons among the magnet materials
Material | Max. Available Remanence, Br (KGs) | Max Energy Products, (BH)max (MGOe) | Max Intrinsic Coercivity, Hci (Oe) | Maximum Working Temp | Machinability Index | $ Index /Weight | $ Index /BHmax | Special Characters |
Neodymium, NdFeB (sintered) | 14.8 | 53 | 35,000 | 220°C /428°F | 50% | 40% | 16% | Can be easily corroded and need plating, Brittle, Strongest |
SmCo | 11 | 30 | 25,000 | 350°C /662°F | 70% | 100% | 64% | Very Brittle, Good magnetic property |
Alnico | 13.5 | 9 | 2,050 | 550°C /1022°F | 100% | 32% | 100% | Withstand high temp, corrosion resistant |
Ceramic | 3.85 | 3.5 | 3,050 | 450°C /842°F | 50% | 5% | 13% | Hard, Brittle |
Flexible | 1.7 | 2 | 3,000 | 100°C /212°F | 10% | 3% | 20% | Like rubber, Can be easily cut using simple cutting tools |